Why Scientists Make Great Leaders - Even If They Don't Know It

Early in my career, I was leading a small team of scientists.  When I transitioned to a new role, I had to hand over that leadership to another member of the team.  During the handover process it transpired that this team member was having doubts about whether he was up to the task, as his leadership style was quite different from mine.

As he soon discovered, however, there is no single "correct" leadership style.  What matters most, as a starting point at least, is authenticity - being true to yourself.  

This memory has led me to reflect of some of the common myths around scientists and their ability to lead:

· “Leaders need charisma, not data.”
FALSE

Whilst charisma is nice to have, it is not essential.  This overlooks the value of clarity, logic, and evidence-based decision-making in leadership.

· “Leadership means leaving science behind.”
FALSE

Leadership can simply mean using scientific skills to influence direction, mentor others, or drive innovation.

· “You need to have all the answers.”
FALSE

Scientists, trained in asking questions and admitting knowledge gaps, is a strength to be nurtured in a leadership role.

Some of the best leadership guidance I've found comes from an unlikely source - Sun Tzu's "The Art of War", written over 2,500 years ago.  

Its timeless lessons on strategy and decision-making under uncertainty have far more in common with effective scientific leadership than the stereotypical ‘charismatic boss’.  

And as there are several thousand books currently in print on Leadership, the fact that “The Art of War” is still a best seller after all this time, means that it’s a great place to start one’s leadership learning journey. 

That’s just me being logical.